Written 8/6/2003
Looking at OBP, SLG and OPS
I've been reading a lot of baseball analysis and discussion since I started this blog about a month and a half ago and one of the notions I continually come across is that OPS is either inaccurated, outdated, or disliked. The primary reason is because the general consensus happens to be that OBP is worth much (3 to 4 times) more than SLG... or at least it should be. Thus lessening the value of an Ichiro and increasing the value of the Garret Anderson's and Juan Gonzalez's of the world. So what happens if you take OBP times 4 and add SLG? AOPS. That's right, AOPS, or Adjusted Onbase Plus Slugging. No, it's not revolutionary, and frankly, I'm not trying to be. I'm not looking for something totally groundbreaking like Dave Eisenberg's BAP, I just want to see what all the fuss is about.
So I opened the trusty Excel program and got to work. It wasn't too difficult and within 20-25 minutes, I was looking at AOPS and it's effects, if any. I then went to looking at the differences in OPS and AOPS rankings of the top 100 to find the biggest jumps. Off the bat, the top three of Bonds, Pujols and Helton don't change:
Part of the reason behind doing this was to see how far it went in bringing up Ichiro's value compared to the sluggers of the world. Since his game is getting on base with base hits instead of homers and doubles, his slugging percentage suffers greatly (.465, 84th). His .380 OBP is good for 38th, though. Again, I admit the system is very crude and simple, but I just wanted to get some sort of gauge and thus some insight into the OPS/OBP/SLG debate. So who were the top beneficiaries of AOPS? DIF = difference in rank between OPS and AOPS.
Castillo gets a nice boost because his .407 slugging ranks 100th out of 100. None of those 10 guys are your typical home run hitting type. Posada leads the bunch with 19, followed by Abreu at 18. All of those guys listed are pure hitters or speed guys that excel at getting on base. Of those listed, only Durham has an OBP under .378 (.367).
Now, who are the most egregious offenders of the old OPS system that weights SLG and OBP equally? My guess is power hitters that smack doubles and homers when they do hit, but also strikeout more than their fair share of times. So let's look at the culprits:
The main "problem" with the above group? They don't walk. They average just 26.0 walks between the 10 of them with 6 below 30 and Chavez leading the bunch at 43. The AOPS big movers average 53.1 walks between them with 4 guys above 70 and only Ichiro (25) with less than 30. ALl o fthe players listed are regarded as good if not great because they rate in top 100 of OPS, but the effort to reward OBP more handsomely is in full force.
I don't know that weighting OBP four times as much as SLG is the answer, but it's a easy, crude measure to chew on until time can be spent on delving deeper into a better way. With that, I leave you with the top ten AOPS with their ranks in OPS, AOPS and the difference:
I'd like to also mention that I'm very new to statistical analysis beyond AVG, HR, RBI, R and SB for fantasy baseball purposes, so I'm going to ask for feedback again, but this time, I could really use it. If you think I'm off my rocker for even weighting OBP heavier or as heavy, tell me... but tell me why also. I'll continue to tinker and play around with this idea of rewarding OBP.
Looking at OBP, SLG and OPS
I've been reading a lot of baseball analysis and discussion since I started this blog about a month and a half ago and one of the notions I continually come across is that OPS is either inaccurated, outdated, or disliked. The primary reason is because the general consensus happens to be that OBP is worth much (3 to 4 times) more than SLG... or at least it should be. Thus lessening the value of an Ichiro and increasing the value of the Garret Anderson's and Juan Gonzalez's of the world. So what happens if you take OBP times 4 and add SLG? AOPS. That's right, AOPS, or Adjusted Onbase Plus Slugging. No, it's not revolutionary, and frankly, I'm not trying to be. I'm not looking for something totally groundbreaking like Dave Eisenberg's BAP, I just want to see what all the fuss is about.
So I opened the trusty Excel program and got to work. It wasn't too difficult and within 20-25 minutes, I was looking at AOPS and it's effects, if any. I then went to looking at the differences in OPS and AOPS rankings of the top 100 to find the biggest jumps. Off the bat, the top three of Bonds, Pujols and Helton don't change:
Rank & Player OPS AOPS
1. B.Bonds 1.234 2.767
2. A.Pujols 1.123 2.446
3. T.Helton 1.069 2.411
Part of the reason behind doing this was to see how far it went in bringing up Ichiro's value compared to the sluggers of the world. Since his game is getting on base with base hits instead of homers and doubles, his slugging percentage suffers greatly (.465, 84th). His .380 OBP is good for 38th, though. Again, I admit the system is very crude and simple, but I just wanted to get some sort of gauge and thus some insight into the OPS/OBP/SLG debate. So who were the top beneficiaries of AOPS? DIF = difference in rank between OPS and AOPS.
Player DIF OPS AOPS
1. L.Castillo +34 0.788 1.931
2. J.Olerud +33 0.787 1.920
3. M.Lieberthal +32 0.811 1.957
4. E.Durazo +31 0.822 1.974
5. M.Loretta +25 0.822 1.959
6. L.Walker +23 0.903 2.181
7. R.Durham +22 0.791 1.892
8. I.Suzuki +20 0.844 1.985
9. B.Abreu +18 0.903 2.124
10.J.Posada +18 0.871 2.065
Castillo gets a nice boost because his .407 slugging ranks 100th out of 100. None of those 10 guys are your typical home run hitting type. Posada leads the bunch with 19, followed by Abreu at 18. All of those guys listed are pure hitters or speed guys that excel at getting on base. Of those listed, only Durham has an OBP under .378 (.367).
Now, who are the most egregious offenders of the old OPS system that weights SLG and OBP equally? My guess is power hitters that smack doubles and homers when they do hit, but also strikeout more than their fair share of times. So let's look at the culprits:
Player DIF OPS AOPS
1. J.Gonzalez -34 0.901 1.888
2. R.Sanders -33 0.843 1.776
3. G.Anderson -31 0.924 1.953
4. V.Wells -25 0.903 1.939
5. C.Patterson -18 0.839 1.827
6. C.Lee -18 0.820 1.788
7. P.Wilson -17 0.939 2.019
8. J.Varitek -17 0.905 1.965
9. S.Hillenbrand -16 0.848 1.883
10.E.Chavez -16 0.846 1.875
The main "problem" with the above group? They don't walk. They average just 26.0 walks between the 10 of them with 6 below 30 and Chavez leading the bunch at 43. The AOPS big movers average 53.1 walks between them with 4 guys above 70 and only Ichiro (25) with less than 30. ALl o fthe players listed are regarded as good if not great because they rate in top 100 of OPS, but the effort to reward OBP more handsomely is in full force.
I don't know that weighting OBP four times as much as SLG is the answer, but it's a easy, crude measure to chew on until time can be spent on delving deeper into a better way. With that, I leave you with the top ten AOPS with their ranks in OPS, AOPS and the difference:
ORnk ARnk Dif Player OPS SOPS
1 1 0 B. Bonds 1.234 2.767
2 2 0 A. Pujols 1.123 2.446
3 3 0 T. Helton 1.069 2.411
6 4 -2 C. Delgado 1.029 2.304
7 5 -2 G. Sheffield 1.015 2.293
9 6 -3 M. Ramirez 0.998 2.264
10 7 -3 J. Giambi 0.984 2.253
17 8 -9 B. Giles 0.947 2.249
19 9 -10 M. Bradley 0.942 2.233
I'd like to also mention that I'm very new to statistical analysis beyond AVG, HR, RBI, R and SB for fantasy baseball purposes, so I'm going to ask for feedback again, but this time, I could really use it. If you think I'm off my rocker for even weighting OBP heavier or as heavy, tell me... but tell me why also. I'll continue to tinker and play around with this idea of rewarding OBP.
